Ïðèâåò ïàðíè.
Î÷åíü õî÷åòñÿ ïîäèñêóòèðîâàòü íà òåìó ñîôòà.
Êòî êàêèå çíàåò ñàéòû ñ áåñïëàòíûì ñîôòîì: ïðîãðàììàìè, âàðåçíèêîì?

Stock Watch XCHC PR...

Aren't able to find any kind of a downside on $XCHC$ did you observe the Press Release today?

http://bit.ly/nPxMdd

Ìîæíî ëè òóò ðàçìåùàòü ññûëêè íà ñàéòû ñ ïîäáîðêàìè ñîôòà?
íå çàïðåùåííî ëè ýòî ïðàâèëàìè?

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your #@*%! the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your #@*%!, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*)

Best Forex Brokers stp ndd ecn http://4runnerforex.com
free metatrader demo, the top forex broker is 4runnerforex tight low spreads.

êîìïüþòåðíàÿ òîìîãðàôèÿ ïðèäàòî÷íûõ ïàçóõ íîñà

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.

Very interesting #@*%!. I have bookmarked you.

I found your blog on #@*%!. I think your blog is the best :)

Nice #@*%!... Very cool design! Useful information. Go on! Good #@*%!

really enjoyed the #@*%! even learnt a few things on the way, keep up the good work.

Áðàâî, êàêèå íóæíûå ñëîâà..., áëåñòÿùàÿ ìûñëü

On that internet #@*%! was inserted a lot of articles. All of published guidelines are true.

dfyhujtfgd f fgh rfghg fhg ty

Hello - I am new to this. But have some experiance.

Just checking to see if my dad s guest book is working, not that I don not believe him. I might just have to have one of these myself.

You will be hearing from me soon. Thanks

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.